For most of its history, China was organized into various dynastic states under the rule of hereditary monarchs. Beginning with the establishment of dynastic rule by Yu the Great c. 2070 BC,[1] and ending with the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in AD 1912, Chinese historiography came to organize itself around the succession of monarchical dynasties.[a][b] Besides those established by the dominant Han ethnic group or its spiritual Huaxia predecessors, dynasties throughout Chinese history were also founded by non-Han peoples.[7]
Dividing Chinese history into dynastic epochs is a convenient and conventional method of periodization.[8] Accordingly, a dynasty may be used to delimit the era during which a family reigned, as well as to describe events, trends, personalities, artistic compositions, and artifacts of that period.[9] For example, porcelain made during the Ming dynasty may be referred to as "Ming porcelain".[10]
The longest-reigning orthodox dynasty of China was the Zhou dynasty, ruling for a total length of about 790 years, albeit it is divided into the Western Zhou and the Eastern Zhou in Chinese historiography.[11] The largest orthodox Chinese dynasty in terms of territorial size was either the Yuan dynasty or the Qing dynasty, depending on the historical source.[12][13][14][15][16][c]
The term "Tiāncháo" (天朝; "Celestial Dynasty" or "Heavenly Dynasty") was frequently employed as a self-reference by Chinese dynasties.[20][21] As a form of respect and subordination, Chinese tributary states referred to these dynasties as "Tiāncháo Shàngguó" (天朝上國; "Celestial Dynasty of the Exalted State") or "Tiāncháo Dàguó" (天朝大國; "Celestial Dynasty of the Great State").
Terminology
The Chinese character 朝 (cháo) originally meant "morning" or "today". Subsequently, its scope was extended to refer to the regime of the incumbent ruler. Terms commonly used when discussing historical Chinese dynasties include:
朝 (cháo; 'dynasty')
朝代 (cháodài; 'dynastic era')
王朝 (wángcháo; 'royal dynasty')[d]
皇朝 (huángcháo; 'imperial dynasty')[22]
History
Start of dynastic rule
As the founder of China's first orthodox dynasty, the Xia dynasty, Yu the Great is conventionally regarded as the inaugurator of dynastic rule in China.[23][a] In the Chinese dynastic system, sovereign rulers theoretically possessed absolute power and private ownership of the realm, even though in practice their actual power was dependent on numerous factors.[24][e] By tradition, the Chinese throne was inherited exclusively by members of the male line, but there were numerous cases whereby the consort kins came to possess de facto power at the expense of the monarchs.[28][f] This concept, known as jiā tiānxià (家天下; "All under Heaven belongs to the ruling family"), was in contrast to the pre-Xia notion of gōng tiānxià (公天下; "All under Heaven belongs to the public") whereby leadership succession was non-hereditary and based on the abdication system.[24][30]
There may also be a predynastic period before a regime managed to overthrow the existing dynasty which led to the official establishment of the new dynasty. For example, the state of Zhou that existed during the Shang dynasty, before its conquest of the Shang which led to the establishment of the Zhou dynasty, is referred to as the Predynastic Zhou[31] or Proto-Zhou.[32] Similarly, the state of Qin that existed during the Zhou dynasty before its wars of unification and the establishment of the Qin dynasty in 221 BC is also referred to as the Predynastic Qin[33][34] or Proto-Qin.[35]
Dynastic transition
The rise and fall of dynasties is a prominent feature of Chinese history. Some scholars have attempted to explain this phenomenon by attributing the success and failure of dynasties to the morality of the rulers, while others have focused on the tangible aspects of monarchical rule.[36] This method of explanation has come to be known as the dynastic cycle.[36][37][38]
Cases of dynastic transition (改朝換代; gǎi cháo huàn dài) in the history of China occurred primarily through two ways: military conquest and usurpation.[39] The supersession of the Liao dynasty by the Jin dynasty was achieved following a series of successful military campaigns, as was the later unification of China proper under the Yuan dynasty; on the other hand, the transition from the Eastern Han to the Cao Wei, as well as from the Southern Qi to the Liang dynasty, were cases of usurpation. Oftentimes, usurpers would seek to portray their predecessors as having relinquished the throne willingly—akin to the abdication system of throne succession—as a means to legitimize their rule.[40]
One might incorrectly infer from viewing historical timelines that transitions between dynasties occurred abruptly and roughly. Rather, new dynasties were often established before the complete overthrow of an existing regime.[41] For example, AD 1644 is frequently cited as the year in which the Qing dynasty succeeded the Ming dynasty in possessing the Mandate of Heaven. However, the Qing dynasty was officially proclaimed in AD 1636 by the Emperor Taizong of Qing through renaming the Later Jin established in AD 1616, while the Ming imperial family would rule the Southern Ming until AD 1662.[42][43] The Ming loyalist Kingdom of Tungning based in Taiwan continued to oppose the Qing until AD 1683.[44] Meanwhile, other factions also fought for control over China during the Ming–Qing transition, most notably the Shun and the Xi dynasties proclaimed by Li Zicheng and Zhang Xianzhong respectively.[45][46][47] This change of ruling houses was a convoluted and prolonged affair, and the Qing took almost two decades to extend their rule over the entirety of China proper.
Similarly, during the earlier Sui–Tang transition, numerous regimes established by rebel forces vied for control and legitimacy as the power of the ruling Sui dynasty weakened. Autonomous regimes that existed during this period of upheaval included, but not limited to, Wei (魏; by Li Mi), Qin (秦; by Xue Ju), Qi (齊; by Gao Tancheng), Xu (許; by Yuwen Huaji), Liang (梁; by Shen Faxing), Liang (梁; by Liang Shidu), Xia (夏; by Dou Jiande), Zheng (鄭; by Wang Shichong), Chu (楚; by Zhu Can), Chu (楚; by Lin Shihong), Wu (吳; by Li Zitong), Yan (燕; by Gao Kaidao), and Song (宋; by Fu Gongshi). The Tang dynasty that superseded the Sui launched a decade-long military campaign to reunify China proper.[48]
Frequently, remnants and descendants of previous dynasties were either purged or granted noble titles in accordance with the "two crownings, three respects" system. The latter served as a means for the reigning dynasty to claim legitimate succession from earlier dynasties. For example, the Emperor Xiaojing of Eastern Wei was accorded the title "Prince of Zhongshan" by the Emperor Wenxuan of Northern Qi following the latter's deposition of the former.[49] Similarly, Chai Yong, a nephew of the Emperor Shizong of Later Zhou, was conferred the title "Duke of Chongyi" by the Emperor Renzong of Song; other descendants of the Later Zhou ruling house came to inherit the noble title thereafter.[50]
Dynastic rule in China collapsed in AD 1912 when the Republic of China superseded the Qing dynasty following the success of the Xinhai Revolution.[53][54] While there were attempts after the Xinhai Revolution to reinstate dynastic rule in China, they were unsuccessful at consolidating their rule and gaining political legitimacy.
During the Xinhai Revolution, there were numerous proposals advocating for the replacement of the Manchu-led Qing dynasty by a new dynasty of Han ethnicity. Kong Lingyi (孔令貽), the Duke of Yansheng and a 76th-generation descendant of Confucius, was identified as a potential candidate for Chinese emperorship by Liang Qichao.[55] Meanwhile, gentry in Anhui and Hebei supported a restoration of the Ming dynasty under Zhu Yuxun (朱煜勳), the Marquis of Extended Grace.[56] Both suggestions were ultimately rejected.
The Empire of China (AD 1915–1916) proclaimed by Yuan Shikai sparked the National Protection War, resulting in the premature collapse of the regime 101 days later.[57] The Manchu Restoration (AD 1917) was an unsuccessful attempt at reviving the Qing dynasty, lasting merely 11 days.[58] Similarly, the Manchukuo (AD 1932–1945; monarchy since AD 1934), a puppet state of the Empire of Japan during World War II with limited diplomatic recognition, is not regarded as a legitimate regime.[59] Ergo, historians usually consider the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor on 12 February 1912 as the end of the Chinese dynastic system. Dynastic rule in China lasted almost four millennia.[53]
Political legitimacy
China was politically divided during multiple periods in its history, with different regions ruled by different dynasties. These dynasties effectively functioned as separate states with their own court and political institutions. Political division existed during the Three Kingdoms, the Sixteen Kingdoms, the Northern and Southern dynasties, and the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms periods, among others.
Relations between Chinese dynasties during periods of division often revolved around political legitimacy, which was derived from the doctrine of the Mandate of Heaven.[60] Dynasties ruled by ethnic Han would proclaim rival dynasties founded by other ethnicities as illegitimate, usually justified based on the concept of Hua–Yi distinction. On the other hand, many dynasties of non-Han origin saw themselves as the legitimate dynasty of China and often sought to portray themselves as the true inheritor of Chinese culture and history. Traditionally, only regimes deemed as "legitimate" or "orthodox" (正統; zhèngtǒng) are termed cháo (朝; "dynasty"); "illegitimate" or "unorthodox" regimes are referred to as guó (國; usually translated as either "state" or "kingdom"[g]), even if these regimes were dynastic in nature.[61]
Such legitimacy disputes existed during the following periods:
Three Kingdoms[62]
The Cao Wei, the Shu Han, and the Eastern Wu considered themselves legitimate while simultaneously denounced the rivaling claims of others.
The Western Jin accepted the Cao Wei as the legitimate dynasty of the Three Kingdoms period and claimed succession from it.
The Tang dynasty viewed the Cao Wei as the legitimate dynasty during this period, whereas the Southern Song scholar Zhu Xi proposed treating the Shu Han as legitimate.[63][64]
The Eastern Jin viewed itself as a continuation of the Western Jin, and thus legitimate.
Several of the Sixteen Kingdoms such as the Han-Zhao, the Later Zhao, and the Former Qin also claimed legitimacy.
Northern and Southern dynasties[66]
All dynasties during this period saw themselves as the legitimate representative of China; the Northern dynasties referred to their southern counterparts as "dǎoyí" (島夷; "island dwelling barbarians"), while the Southern dynasties called their northern neighbors "suǒlǔ" (索虜; "barbarians with braids").[67][68]
Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms[69]
Having directly succeeded the Tang dynasty, the Later Liang considered itself to be a legitimate dynasty.[69]
The Later Tang regarded itself as the restorer of the earlier Tang dynasty and rejected the legitimacy of its predecessor, the Later Liang.[69]
The Later Jin succeeded the Later Tang and accepted it as a legitimate regime.[69]
The Southern Tang was, for a period of time, considered the legitimate dynasty during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period.[69]
Since the Song dynasty, Chinese historiography has generally considered the Five Dynasties, as opposed to the contemporary Ten Kingdoms, to be legitimate.[69][70]
The Ming dynasty recognized the preceding Yuan dynasty as a legitimate Chinese dynasty, but asserted that it had succeeded the Mandate of Heaven from the Yuan, thus considering the Northern Yuan as illegitimate.
Northern Yuan rulers maintained the dynastic name "Great Yuan" and claimed traditional Han-style titles continuously until AD 1388 or AD 1402; Han-style titles were restored on several occasions thereafter for brief periods, notably during the reigns of Taisun Khan, Choros Esen, and Dayan Khan.[77]
The historian Rashipunsug argued that the Northern Yuan had succeeded the legitimacy from the Yuan dynasty; the Qing dynasty, which later defeated and annexed the Northern Yuan, inherited this legitimacy, thus rendering the Ming illegitimate.[78]
The Qing dynasty recognized the preceding Ming dynasty as legitimate, but asserted that it had succeeded the Mandate of Heaven from the Ming, thus refuting the claimed legitimacy of the Southern Ming.
The Southern Ming continued to claim legitimacy until its eventual defeat by the Qing.
The Ming loyalist Kingdom of Tungning in Taiwan denounced the Qing dynasty as illegitimate.
The Joseon dynasty of Korea and the Later Lê dynasty of Vietnam had at various times considered the Southern Ming, instead of the Qing dynasty, as legitimate.[80][81]
The Tokugawa shogunate of Japan did not accept the legitimacy of the Qing dynasty and instead saw itself as the rightful representative of Huá (華; "China"); this narrative served as the basis of Japanese texts such as Chūchō Jijitsu and Kai Hentai.[82][83][84]
Traditionally, periods of disunity often resulted in heated debates among officials and historians over which prior dynasties could and should be considered orthodox, given that it was politically imperative for a dynasty to present itself as being linked in an unbroken lineage of moral and political authority back to ancient times. However, the Northern Song statesman Ouyang Xiu propounded that such orthodoxy existed in a state of limbo during fragmented periods and was restored after political unification was achieved.[85] From this perspective, the Song dynasty possessed legitimacy by virtue of its ability to end the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period despite not having succeeded the orthodoxy from the Later Zhou. Similarly, Ouyang considered the concept of orthodoxy to be in oblivion during the Three Kingdoms, the Sixteen Kingdoms, and the Northern and Southern dynasties periods.[85]
Traditionally, as most Chinese historiographical sources uphold the idea of unilineal dynastic succession, only one dynasty could be considered orthodox at any given time.[70] Most historical sources consider the legitimate line of succession to be as follows:[70]
These historical legitimacy disputes are similar to the modern competing claims of legitimacy by the People's Republic of China based in Beijing and the Republic of China based in Taipei. Both regimes formally adhere to the One-China principle and claim to be the sole legitimate representative of the whole of China.[86]
Agnatic lineages
The Emperor Guangwu of Han (top) and the Emperor Zhaolie of Shu Han (bottom) were descended from a common paternal ancestor but are typically considered by historians to be the founders of two separate dynasties.
There were several groups of Chinese dynasties that were ruled by families with patrilineal relations, yet due to various reasons these regimes are considered to be separate dynasties and given distinct retroactive names for historiographical purpose. Such conditions as differences in their official dynastic title and fundamental changes having occurred to their rule would necessitate nomenclatural distinction in academia, despite these ruling clans having shared common ancestral origins.
Additionally, numerous other dynasties claimed descent from earlier dynasties as a calculated political move to obtain or enhance their legitimacy, even if such claims were unfounded.
The agnatic relations of the following groups of Chinese dynasties are typically recognized by historians:
The Western Han, the Eastern Han, the Shu Han, and the Liu Song were ruled by the House of Liu; the first two of which are collectively known as the Han dynasty[88]
The first emperor of the Eastern Han, the Emperor Guangwu of Han, was a ninth-generation descendant of the Western Han founder, the Emperor Gao of Han; he was also a seventh-generation descendant of the sixth Western Han monarch, the Emperor Jing of Han
The founder of the Shu Han, the Emperor Zhaolie of Shu Han, was also descended from the Emperor Jing of Han
The Northern Wei, the Southern Liang, the Eastern Wei, and the Western Wei were ruled by the House of Tuoba (later renamed the House of Yuan and the House of Tufa respectively)
The Southern Qi and the Liang dynasty were ruled by the House of Xiao
The founder of the Liang dynasty, the Emperor Wu of Liang, was a son of the Emperor Wen of Liang who was a distant cousin of the Southern Qi founder, the Emperor Gao of Southern Qi
The Emperor Taizong of Qing was both the last Later Jin khan and the first emperor of the Qing dynasty
Classification
Central Plain dynasties
The Central Plain is a vast area on the lower reaches of the Yellow River which formed the cradle of Chinese civilization. "Central Plain dynasties" (中原王朝; Zhōngyuán wángcháo) refer to dynasties of China that had their capital cities situated within the Central Plain.[92] This term could refer to dynasties of both Han and non-Han ethnic origins.[92]
Unified dynasties
"Unified dynasties" (大一統王朝; dàyītǒng wángcháo) refer to dynasties of China, regardless of their ethnic origin, that achieved the unification of China proper. "China proper" is a region generally regarded as the traditional heartland of the Han people, and is not equivalent to the term "China". Imperial dynasties that had attained the unification of China proper may be known as the "Chinese Empire" or the "Empire of China" (中華帝國; Zhōnghuá Dìguó).[93][94][h]
The concept of "great unity" or "grand unification" (大一統; dàyītǒng) was first mentioned in the Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals that was supposedly authored by the Qi scholar Gongyang Gao.[95][96][97] Other prominent figures like Confucius and Mencius also elaborated on this concept in their respective works.[98][99]
According to the historian and sinologist Karl August Wittfogel, dynasties of China founded by non-Han peoples that ruled parts or all of China proper could be classified into two types, depending on the means by which the ruling ethnic groups had entered China proper.[103]
"Infiltration dynasties" or "dynasties of infiltration" (滲透王朝; shèntòu wángcháo) refer to Chinese dynasties founded by non-Han ethnicities that tended towards accepting Han culture and assimilating into the Han-dominant society.[103] For instance, the Han-Zhao and the Northern Wei, established by the Xiongnu and Xianbei ethnicities respectively, are considered infiltration dynasties of China.[103]
"Conquest dynasties" or "dynasties of conquest" (征服王朝; zhēngfú wángcháo) refer to dynasties of China established by non-Han peoples that tended towards resisting Han culture and preserving the identities of the ruling ethnicities.[103][104] For example, the Liao dynasty and the Yuan dynasty, ruled by the Khitan and Mongol peoples respectively, are considered conquest dynasties of China.[103]
These terms remain sources of controversy among scholars who believe that Chinese history should be analyzed and understood from a multiethnic and multicultural perspective.[105]
Naming convention
Official nomenclature
It was customary for Chinese monarchs to adopt an official name for the realm, known as the guóhào (國號; "name of the state"), upon the establishment of a dynasty.[106][107] During the rule of a dynasty, its guóhào functioned as the formal name of the state, both internally and for diplomatic purposes.
The formal name of Chinese dynasties was usually derived from one of the following sources:
The name of the ruling tribe or tribal confederation[108][109]
e.g., the Western Xia dynasty took its name from its ruling class, the Xia tribal confederation[108]
The noble title held by the dynastic founder prior to the founding of the dynasty[108][109]
e.g., the Emperor Wu of Chen adopted the dynastic name "Chen" from his pre-imperial title "Prince of Chen" upon the establishment of the Chen dynasty[110]
The name of a historical state that occupied the same geographical location as the new dynasty[109][111]
e.g., the Former Yan was officially named "Yan" based on the ancient State of Yan located in the same region[111]
The name of a previous dynasty from which the new dynasty claimed descent or succession from, even if such familial link was questionable[109]
A term with auspicious or other significant connotations[108][109]
e.g., the Yuan dynasty was officially the "Great Yuan", a name derived from a clause in the Classic of Changes, "dà zāi Qián Yuán" (大哉乾元; "Great is the Heavenly and Primal")[113]
There were instances whereby the official name was changed during the reign of a dynasty. For example, the dynasty known retroactively as Southern Han initially used the name "Yue", only to be renamed to "Han" subsequently.[114]
The official title of several dynasties bore the character "dà" (大; "great"). In Yongzhuang Xiaopin by the Ming historian Zhu Guozhen, it was claimed that the first dynasty to do so was the Yuan dynasty.[115][116] However, several sources like the History of Liao and the History of Jin compiled by the Yuan historian Toqto'a revealed that the official dynastic name of some earlier dynasties such as the Liao and the Jin also contained the character "dà".[117][118] It was also common for officials, subjects, or tributary states of a particular dynasty to include the term "dà" (or an equivalent term in other languages) when referring to this dynasty as a form of respect, even if the official dynastic name did not include it.[116] For instance, The Chronicles of Japan referred to the Tang dynasty as "Dai Tō" (大唐; "Great Tang") despite its dynastic name being simply "Tang".
While all dynasties of China sought to associate their respective realm with Zhōngguó (中國; "Central State"; usually translated as "Middle Kingdom" or "China" in English texts) and various other names of China, none of these regimes officially used such names as their dynastic title.[119][120] Although the Qing dynasty explicitly identified their state with and employed "Zhōngguó"—and its Manchu equivalent "Dulimbai Gurun" (ᡩᡠᠯᡳᠮᠪᠠᡳ ᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨ)—in official capacity in numerous international treaties beginning with the Treaty of Nerchinsk dated AD 1689, its dynastic name had remained the "Great Qing".[121][122] "Zhōngguó", which has become nearly synonymous with "China" in modern times, is a concept with geographical, political, and cultural connotations.[123]
The adoption of guóhào, as well as the importance assigned to it, had promulgated within the Sinosphere. Notably, rulers of Vietnam and Korea also declared guóhào for their respective realm.
Retroactive nomenclature
In Chinese historiography, historians generally do not refer to dynasties directly by their official name. Instead, historiographical names, which were most commonly derived from their official name, are used. For instance, the Sui dynasty is known as such because its formal name was "Sui". Likewise, the Jin dynasty was officially the "Great Jin".
When more than one dynasty shared the same Chinese character(s) as their formal name, as was common in Chinese history, prefixes are retroactively applied to dynastic names by historians in order to distinguish between these similarly-named regimes.[8][41][124] Frequently used prefixes include:
e.g., Shu Han (the prefix "Shu" is a reference to the realm's geographical location at Sichuan), Hu Xia (the prefix "Hu", meaning "barbarian", refers to the dynasty's ethnic Xiongnu origin)
A dynasty could be referred to by more than one retroactive name in Chinese historiography, albeit some are more widely used than others. For instance, the Western Han is also known as the "Former Han", and the Yang Wu is also called the "Southern Wu".[132][133]
Scholars usually make a historiographical distinction for dynasties whose rule were interrupted. For example, the Song dynasty is divided into the Northern Song and the Southern Song, with the Jingkang Incident as the dividing line; the original "Song" founded by the Emperor Taizu of Song was therefore differentiated from the "Song" restored under the Emperor Gaozong of Song.[134] In such cases, the regime had collapsed, only to be re-established; a nomenclatural distinction between the original regime and the new regime is thus necessary for historiographical purpose. Major exceptions to this historiographical practice include the Western Qin, the Southern Liang, and the Tang dynasty; the first two were interrupted by the Later Qin, while the continuity of the latter was broken by the Wu Zhou.[135][136][137]
In Chinese sources, the term "dynasty" (朝; cháo) is usually omitted when referencing dynasties that have prefixes in their historiographical names. Such a practice is sometimes adopted in English usage, even though the inclusion of the word "dynasty" is also widely seen in English scholarly writings. For example, the Northern Zhou is also sometimes referred to as the "Northern Zhou dynasty".[138]
Often, scholars would refer to a specific Chinese dynasty by attaching the word "China" after the dynastic name. For instance, "Tang China" refers to the Chinese state under the rule of the Tang dynasty and the corresponding historical era.[139]
Territorial extent
While the earliest orthodox Chinese dynasties were established along the Yellow River and the Yangtze in China proper, numerous Chinese dynasties later expanded beyond the region to encompass other territorial domains.[140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152]
Territorially, the largest orthodox Chinese dynasty was either the Yuan dynasty or the Qing dynasty, depending on the historical source.[12][13][14][15][16][c] This discrepancy can be mainly attributed to the ambiguous northern border of the Yuan realm: whereas some sources describe the Yuan border as located to the immediate north of the northern shore of Lake Baikal, others posit that the Yuan dynasty reached as far north as the Arctic coast, with its western boundary with the Golden Horde in Siberia delimited by the Ob and the Irtysh.[155][156][157] In contrast, the borders of the Qing dynasty were demarcated and reinforced through a series of international treaties, and thus were more well-defined.
Apart from exerting direct control over the Chinese realm, various dynasties of China also maintained hegemony over other states and tribes through the Chinese tributary system.[158] The Chinese tributary system first emerged during the Western Han and lasted until the 19th century AD when the Sinocentric order broke down.[159][160]
The modern territorial claims of both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China are inherited from the lands once held by the Qing dynasty at the time of its collapse.[16][161][162][163][164]
List of major Chinese dynasties
This list includes only the major dynasties of China that are typically found in simplified forms of Chinese historical timelines. This list is neither comprehensive nor representative of Chinese history as a whole.
Dynasties counted among the "Ten Kingdoms" within the broader "Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms"
Criteria for inclusion This list includes only the major dynasties of China that are typically found in simplified forms of Chinese historical timelines. Many other dynastic regimes existed within or overlapped with the geographical boundaries specified in the definition of "China" in the study of Chinese historical geography.[cc] These were:[292]
^ a bWhile the Xia dynasty is typically considered to be the first orthodox Chinese dynasty, numerous sources including the Book of Documents mention two other dynasties that preceded the Xia: the "Tang" (唐) and the "Yu" (虞) dynasties.[2][3][4][5] The former is sometimes called the "Ancient Tang" (古唐) to distinguish it from other dynasties named "Tang".[6] Should the historicity of these earlier dynasties be attested, Yu the Great would not have been the initiator of dynastic rule in China.
^All attempts at restoring monarchical and dynastic rule in China following the Xinhai Revolution ended in failure. Hence, the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in AD 1912 is typically regarded as the formal end of the Chinese monarchy.
^ a bAs per contemporary historiographical norm, the "Yuan dynasty" in this article refers exclusively to the realm based in Dadu. However, the Han-style dynastic name "Great Yuan" (大元) as proclaimed by the Emperor Shizu of Yuan and the claim to Chinese political orthodoxy were meant for the entire Mongol Empire.[17][18][19] In spite of this, "Yuan dynasty" is rarely used in the broad sense of the definition by modern-day scholars due to the de factodisintegration of the Mongol Empire.
^While the character 王 (wáng) is translated as "king", this term is often more broadly applied to all dynasties, including those whose rulers held non-royal titles, such as "emperor".[22]
^A powerful consort kin, usually a male, could force the reigning monarch to abdicate in his favor, thereby prompting a change in dynasty. For example, Wang Mang of the Xin dynasty was a nephew of the Empress Xiaoyuan who in turn was the spouse of the Western Han ruler, the Emperor Yuan of Han.[29]
^The term "kingdom" is potentially misleading as not all rulers held the title of king. For example, all sovereigns of the Cao Wei held the title huángdì (皇帝; "emperor") during their reign despite the realm being listed as one of the "Three Kingdoms". Similarly, monarchs of the Western Qin, one of the "Sixteen Kingdoms", bore the title wáng (王; usually translated as "prince" in English writings).
^"Anterior" is employed in some sources in place of "Former".[125][126]
^"Latter" or "Posterior" is employed in some sources in place of "Later".[127][128][129][130][131]
^The English and Chinese names stated are historiographical denominations. These should not be confused with the guóhào officially proclaimed by each dynasty. A dynasty may be known by more than one historiographical name.
^ a bThe English names shown are based on the Hanyu Pinyin renditions, the most common form of Mandarin romanization currently in adoption. Some scholarly works utilize the Wade–Giles system, which may differ drastically in the spelling of certain words. For instance, the Qing dynasty is rendered as "Ch῾ing dynasty" in Wade–Giles.[165]
^ a bThe Chinese characters shown are in Traditional Chinese. Some characters may have simplified versions that are currently used in mainland China. For instance, the characters for the Eastern Han are written as "東漢" in Traditional Chinese and "东汉" in Simplified Chinese.
^While Chinese historiography tends to treat dynasties as being of specific ethnic stocks, there were some monarchs who had mixed heritage.[166] For instance, the Jiaqing Emperor of the Manchu-led Qing dynasty was of mixed Manchu and Han descent, having derived his Han ancestry from his mother, the Empress Xiaoyichun.[167]
^The status of a dynasty was dependent upon the supreme title bore by its monarch at any given time. For instance, since all monarchs of the Chen dynasty held the title of emperor during their reign, the Chen dynasty was of imperial status.
^The monarchs listed were the de facto founders of dynasties. However, it was common for Chinese monarchs to posthumously honor earlier members of the family as monarchs. For instance, while the Later Jin was officially established by the Emperor Gaozu of Later Jin, four earlier members of the ruling house were posthumously accorded imperial titles, the most senior of which was Shi Jing who was conferred the temple name "Jingzu" (靖祖) and the posthumous name "Emperor Xiao'an" (孝安皇帝).
^In addition to the ancestral name Si (姒), the ruling house of the Xia dynasty also bore the lineage name Xiahou (夏后).[168]
^ a bYouqiong Yi, surnamed Youqiong (有窮), was of Dongyi descent.[169] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bYun Zhuo, surnamed Yun (妘), was of Dongyi descent.[170] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bThe rule of the Xia dynasty was traditionally dated 2205–1766 BC as per the calculations made by the historian Liu Xin.[172][173] Accordingly, the Xia dynasty lasted 439 years.
^ a bThe rule of the Shang dynasty was traditionally dated 1766–1122 BC as per the calculations made by the historian Liu Xin.[172][175] Accordingly, the Shang dynasty lasted 644 years.
^ a bThe rule of the Western Zhou was traditionally dated 1122–771 BC as per the calculations made by the historian Liu Xin.[172][175] Accordingly, the Western Zhou lasted 351 years.
^ a b cThe terms "Chinese Empire" and "Empire of China" usually refer to the Chinese state under the rule of various imperial dynasties, particularly those that had unified China proper.[93][94]
^In addition to the ancestral name Ying (嬴), the ruling house of the Qin dynasty also bore the lineage name Zhao (趙).[177]
^ a bThe Western Han (西漢) and the Eastern Han (東漢) are collectively known as the Han dynasty (漢朝; Hàn Cháo; Han4 Ch῾ao2; ㄏㄢˋ ㄔㄠˊ).[88]
^ a bSome historians consider 206 BC, the year in which the Emperor Gao of Han was proclaimed "King of Han", to be the start of the Western Han.[180] Accordingly, the Western Han lasted 215 years.
^Liu Ying was not officially enthroned and maintained the title huáng tàizǐ (皇太子; "crown prince") during the regency of Wang Mang.[181] The last Western Han monarch who was officially enthroned was the Emperor Ping of Han.
^ a bThe Western Jin (西晉) and the Eastern Jin (東晉) are collectively known as the Jin dynasty (晉朝; Jìn Cháo; Chin4 Ch῾ao2; ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄔㄠˊ).[89]
^ a b cThe names of the Jin dynasty (晉朝) of the Sima clan and the Jin dynasty (金朝) of the Wanyan clan are rendered similarly using the Hanyu Pinyin system, even though they do not share the same Chinese character for "Jin".
^ a bThe Sixteen Kingdoms are also referred to as the "Sixteen Kingdoms of the Five Barbarians" (五胡十六國; Wǔ Hú Shíliù Guó), although not all dynasties counted among the 16 were ruled by the "Five Barbarians".[190]
^The ruling house of the Han-Zhao initially bore the surname Luandi (攣鞮).[192][193]Liu (劉) was subsequently adopted as the surname prior to the establishment of the Han-Zhao.
^As Jin Zhun, surnamed Jin (靳), was not a member of the Liu (劉) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.[194]
^ a b cSome historians consider AD 303, the year in which the Emperor Jing of Cheng-Han declared the era name "Jianchu" (建初), to be the start of the Cheng-Han.[197] Accordingly, the Cheng-Han was founded by the Emperor Jing of Cheng-Han and lasted 44 years.
^The ruling house of the Former Qin initially bore the surname Pu (蒲).[201] The Emperor Huiwu of Former Qin subsequently adopted Fu (苻) as the surname in AD 349 prior to the establishment of the Former Qin.[201]
^ a b cSome historians consider AD 350, the year in which the Emperor Huiwu of Former Qin was proclaimed "Prince of Three Qins", to be the start of the Former Qin.[202] Accordingly, the Former Qin was founded by the Emperor Huiwu of Former Qin and lasted 44 years.
^As Lan Han, surnamed Lan (蘭), was not a member of the Murong (慕容) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.[203]
^ a bThe Emperor Huiyi of Yan was of Gaogouli descent. Originally surnamed Gao (高), he was an adopted member of the Murong (慕容) clan.[204] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bDepending on the status of the Emperor Huiyi of Yan, the Later Yan ended in either AD 407 or AD 409 and lasted either 23 years or 25 years.
^The Western Qin was interrupted by the Later Qin between AD 400 and AD 409. Chinese historiography does not make a distinction between the realm that existed up to AD 400 and the realm restored in AD 409. The Prince Wuyuan of Western Qin was both the last ruler before the interregnum and the first ruler after the interregnum.
^ a bThe names of the Later Liang (後涼) of the Lü clan and the Later Liang (後梁) of the Zhu clan are rendered similarly using the Hanyu Pinyin system, even though they do not share the same Chinese character for "Liang".
^The ruling house of the Southern Liang initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋).[90] Tufa Pigu subsequently adopted Tufa (禿髮) as the surname prior to the establishment of the Southern Liang.[90]
^The Southern Liang was interrupted by the Later Qin between AD 404 and AD 408. Chinese historiography does not make a distinction between the realm that existed up to AD 404 and the realm restored in AD 408. The Prince Jing of Southern Liang was both the last ruler before the interregnum and the first ruler after the interregnum.
^The ruling house of the Hu Xia initially bore the surname Luandi (攣鞮).[214]Liu (劉) was adopted as the surname prior to the establishment of the Hu Xia.[215] The Emperor Wulie of Hu Xia subsequently adopted Helian (赫連) as the surname in AD 413 after the establishment of the Hu Xia.[215]
^ a bThe Emperor Huiyi of Yan was of Gaogouli descent. Originally surnamed Gao (高), he was an adopted member of the Murong (慕容) clan.[204] The enthronement of the Emperor Wencheng of Northern Yan was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bDepending on the status of the Emperor Huiyi of Yan, the Northern Yan was established in either AD 407 or AD 409 and lasted either 29 years or 27 years.
^The ruling house of the Northern Wei initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋).[219] The Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei subsequently adopted Yuan (元) as the surname in AD 493 after the establishment of the Northern Wei.[219]
^The ruling house of the Eastern Wei initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋).[219] The Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei subsequently adopted Yuan (元) as the surname in AD 493 prior to the establishment of the Eastern Wei.[219]
^The ruling house of the Western Wei initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋).[219] The Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei subsequently adopted Yuan (元) as the surname in AD 493 prior to the establishment of the Western Wei, only for the Emperor Gong of Western Wei to restore the surname Tuoba in AD 554 after the establishment of the Western Wei.[219][222]
^The ruling house of the Sui dynasty initially bore the surname Yang (楊). The Western Wei later bestowed the surname Puliuru (普六茹) upon the family.[228] The Emperor Wen of Sui subsequently restored Yang as the surname in AD 580 prior to the establishment of the Sui dynasty.
^The ruling house of the Tang dynasty initially bore the surname Li (李). The Western Wei later bestowed the surname Daye (大野) upon the family.[230]Li was subsequently restored as the surname in AD 580 prior to the establishment of the Tang dynasty.
^The Tang dynasty was interrupted by the Wu Zhou between AD 690 and AD 705. Chinese historiography does not make a distinction between the realm that existed up to AD 690 and the realm restored in AD 705. The Emperor Ruizong of Tang was the last ruler before the interregnum; the Emperor Zhongzong of Tang was the first ruler after the interregnum.
^The ruling house of the Later Tang initially bore the surname Zhuye (朱邪).[235] The Emperor Xianzu of Later Tang subsequently adopted Li (李) as the surname in AD 869 prior to the establishment of the Later Tang.[235]
^The Emperor Mingzong of Later Tang, originally without surname, was an adopted member of the Li (李) clan.[236] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bLi Congke was of Han descent. Originally surnamed Wang (王), he was an adopted member of the Li (李) clan.[237] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bThe names of the Later Jin (後晉) of the Shi clan and the Later Jin (後金) of the Aisin Gioro clan are rendered similarly using the Hanyu Pinyin system, even though they do not share the same Chinese character for "Jin".
^The Emperor Shizong of Later Zhou, originally surnamed Chai (柴), was an adopted member of the Guo (郭) clan.[240] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a b cSome historians consider AD 902, the year in which the Emperor Taizu of Yang Wu was proclaimed "Prince of Wu", to be the start of the Yang Wu.[244] Accordingly, the Yang Wu was founded by the Emperor Taizu of Yang Wu and lasted 35 years.
^As Zhu Wenjin, surnamed Zhu (朱), was not a member of the Wang (王) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.[246]
^The ruling house of the Jingnan initially bore the surname Gao (高). The Prince Wuxin of Chu subsequently adopted Zhu (朱) as the surname, only to restore the surname Gao prior to the establishment of the Jingnan.[247]
^The ruling house of the Southern Tang initially bore the surname Li (李). The Emperor Liezu of Southern Tang subsequently adopted Xu (徐) as the surname, only to restore the surname Li in AD 939 after the establishment of the Southern Tang.[248]
^ a bLiu Ji'en was of Han descent. Originally surnamed Xue (薛), he was an adopted member of the Liu (劉) clan.[250] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bThe Emperor Yingwu of Northern Han was of Han descent. Originally surnamed He (何), he was an adopted member of the Liu (劉) clan.[251] His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
^ a bSome historians consider AD 907, the year in which the Emperor Taizu of Liao was proclaimed "Khagan of the Khitans", to be the start of the Liao dynasty.[254] Accordingly, the Liao dynasty lasted 218 years.
^ a bKuchlug, originally without surname, was of Naiman descent. As he was not a member of the Yelü (耶律) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.[255][256]
^ a bSome historians consider AD 1132, the year in which the Emperor Dezong of Western Liao was proclaimed "Gurkhan", to be the start of the Western Liao.[258] Accordingly, the Western Liao lasted 86 years.
^The ruling house of the Western Xia initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋). The Tang dynasty and the Song dynasty later bestowed the surnames Li (李) and Zhao (趙) upon the family respectively. The Emperor Jingzong of Western Xia subsequently adopted Weiming (嵬名) as the surname in AD 1032 prior to the establishment of the Western Xia.[261]
^The ruling house of the Yuan dynasty initially bore the surname Kiyad (乞顏). Borjigin Munkhag and Kiyad-Borjigin Khabul respectively adopted Borjigin (孛兒只斤) and Kiyad-Borjigin (乞顏·孛兒只斤) as the surname prior to the establishment of the Yuan dynasty. The Emperor Liezu of Yuan subsequently restored Borjigin as the surname prior to the establishment of the Yuan dynasty.
^ a bSome historians consider AD 1260, the year in which the Emperor Shizu of Yuan was proclaimed "Khagan of the Great Mongol State" and declared the era name "Zhongtong" (中統), to be the start of the Yuan dynasty.[265] Accordingly, the Yuan dynasty lasted 108 years.
^The ruling house of the Northern Yuan initially bore the surname Kiyad (乞顏). Borjigin Munkhag and Kiyad-Borjigin Khabul respectively adopted Borjigin (孛兒只斤) and Kiyad-Borjigin (乞顏·孛兒只斤) as the surname prior to the establishment of the Northern Yuan. The Emperor Liezu of Yuan subsequently restored Borjigin as the surname prior to the establishment of the Northern Yuan.
^ a bChoros Esen, surnamed Choros (綽羅斯), was of Oirat descent. As he was not a member of the Borjigin (孛兒只斤) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.[266][267]
^ a b cTraditional Chinese historiography considers the Northern Yuan to have ended in either AD 1388 or AD 1402 when the dynastic name "Great Yuan" was abolished.[269][270] Accordingly, the Northern Yuan lasted either 20 years or 34 years, and its last ruler was either the Tianyuan Emperor or the Örüg Temür Khan. However, some historians regard the Mongol-ruled regime that existed from AD 1388 or AD 1402 up to AD 1635—referred to in the History of Ming as "Dada" (韃靼)—as a direct continuation of the Northern Yuan.[271]
^ a b cSome historians consider AD 1664, the year in which the reign of the Dingwu Emperor came to an end, to be the end of the Southern Ming.[274] Accordingly, the Southern Ming lasted 20 years and its last ruler was the Dingwu Emperor. However, the existence and identity of the Dingwu Emperor, supposedly reigned from AD 1646 to AD 1664, are disputed.
^The Qing dynasty was briefly restored between 1 July 1917 and 12 July 1917 when Zhang Xun reinstalled the Xuantong Emperor to the Chinese throne.[58] Due to the abortive nature of the event, it is usually excluded from Qing history.
^As proposed by scholars such as Tan Qixiang, the geographical extent of "China" as defined in Chinese historical geography largely corresponds with the territories once ruled by the Qing dynasty during its territorial peak between the AD 1750s and the AD 1840s, prior to the outbreak of the First Opium War.[280] At its height, the Qing dynasty exercised jurisdiction over an area larger than 13 million km2, encompassing:[281][282][283]
Modern Chinese historiography considers all regimes, regardless of the ethnicity of the ruling class, that were established within or overlapped with the above geographical boundaries to be part of Chinese history.[290][291] Similarly, all ethnic groups that were active within the above geographical boundaries are considered ethnicities of China.[290][291] Regions outside of the above geographical boundaries but were under Chinese rule during various historical periods are included in the histories of the respective Chinese dynasties.
^The dynastic regimes included in this timeline are the same as the list above.
References
Citations
^Xueqin, Li (2002-01-01). "The Xia-Shang-Zhou Chronology Project: Methodology and Results". Journal of East Asian Archaeology. 4 (1): 332. doi:10.1163/156852302322454585. ISSN 1387-6813.
^Nadeau, Randall (2012). The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Chinese Religions. John Wiley & Sons. p. 31. ISBN9781444361971.
^Yeo, Khiok-Khng (2008). Musing with Confucius and Paul: Toward a Chinese Christian Theology. James Clarke & Company Limited. p. 24. ISBN9780227903308.
^Chao, Yuan-ling (2009). Medicine and Society in Late Imperial China: A Study of Physicians in Suzhou, 1600–1850. Peter Lang. p. 73. ISBN9781433103810.
^Atwell, William (1978). "Ming China and the Emerging World Economy". In Twitchett, Denis; Fairbank, John; Mote, Frederick (eds.). The Cambridge History of China. Cambridge University Press. pp. 394–395. ISBN9780521243339.
^ a b cSadow, Lauren; Peeters, Bert; Mullan, Kerry (2019). Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication: Minimal English (and Beyond). p. 100. ISBN9789813299795.
^ a bBauch, Martin; Schenk, Gerrit (2019). The Crisis of the 14th Century: Teleconnections between Environmental and Societal Change?. p. 153. ISBN9783110660784.
^ a bRuan, Jiening; Zhang, Jie; Leung, Cynthia (2015). Chinese Language Education in the United States. p. 9. ISBN9783319213088.
^ a bWei, Chao-hsin (1988). The General Themes of the Ocean Culture World. p. 17.
^ a bAdler, Philip; Pouwels, Randall (2011). World Civilizations: Volume I: To 1700. p. 373. ISBN9781133171065.
^ a b cRowe, William (2010). China's Last Empire: The Great Qing. p. 1. ISBN9780674054554.
^Robinson, David (2019). In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire: Ming China and Eurasia. p. 50. ISBN9781108482448.
^Robinson, David (2009). Empire's Twilight: Northeast Asia Under the Mongols. p. 293. ISBN9780674036086.
^Brook, Timothy; Walt van Praag, Michael van; Boltjes, Miek (2018). Sacred Mandates: Asian International Relations since Chinggis Khan. p. 45. ISBN9780226562933.
^Wang, Hongsheng (2007). 历史的瀑布与峡谷:中华文明的文化结构和现代转型. p. 139. ISBN9787300081830.
^ a b"陆大鹏谈翻译:历史上的"王朝"与"皇朝"". The Paper (in Chinese). Retrieved 4 August 2020.
^Ebrey, Patricia; Liu, Kwang-Ching (2010). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. p. 10. ISBN9780521124331.
^ a bChan, Joseph (2013). Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. p. 213. ISBN9781400848690.
^Koenig, Lion; Chaudhuri, Bidisha (2017). Politics of the 'Other' in India and China: Western Concepts in Non-Western Contexts. p. 157. ISBN9781317530558.
^Gao, Quanxi; Zhang, Wei; Tian, Feilong (2015). The Road to the Rule of Law in Modern China. p. 135. ISBN9783662456378.
^To, Michael (2017). China's Quest for a Modern Constitutional Polity: from dynastic empires to modern republics. p. 54.
^Whitaker, Donald; Shinn, Rinn-Sup (1972). Area Handbook for the People's Republic of China. p. 37.
^Xiong, Deshan (2015). Social History Of China. p. 95. ISBN9781938368264.
^Qi, Zhixiang (2016). 中國現當代人學史:思想演變的時代特徵及其歷史軌跡. p. 21. ISBN9789869244923.
^Gina L. Barnes (2015). Archaeology of East Asia: The Rise of Civilization in China, Korea and Japan. Oxbow Books. p. 45. ISBN9781785700712.
^Lothar von Falkenhausen (2012). The Lloyd Cotsen Study Collection of Chinese Bronze Mirrors: Volume 2. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press. p. 44. ISBN9781950446445.
^Zhixin Sun (2017). Age of Empires: Art of the Qin and Han Dynasties. Metropolitan Museum of Art. p. 33. ISBN9781588396174.
^Lothar von Falkenhausen (2006). Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius (1000-250 BC). Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press. p. 235. ISBN9781938770456.
^ a bPerdue, Peter (2009). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Harvard University Press. p. 6. ISBN9780674042025.
^Elleman, Bruce; Paine, Sarah (2019). Modern China: Continuity and Change, 1644 to the Present. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 19. ISBN9781538103876.
^Zheng, Yongnian; Huang, Yanjie (2018). Market in State: The Political Economy of Domination in China. Cambridge University Press. p. 83. ISBN9781108473446.
^"我国古代改朝换代的方式不外乎两种,哪种才是主流?". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^ a bWilkinson, Endymion (2000). Chinese History: A Manual. Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 14. ISBN9780674002494.
^Perkins, Dorothy (2013). Encyclopedia of China: History and Culture. Routledge. p. 1. ISBN9781135935627.
^Di Cosmo, Nicola (2007). The Diary of a Manchu Soldier in Seventeenth-Century China: "My Service in the Army", by Dzengseo. Routledge. p. 1. ISBN9781135789558.
^Elman, Benjamin (2006). A Cultural History of Modern Science in China. Harvard University Press. p. 46. ISBN9780674023062.
^Tanner, Harold (2009). China: A History. Hackett. p. 335. ISBN978-0872209152.
^Pines, Yuri (2012). The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy. p. 157. ISBN978-0691134956.
^Mote, Frederick (2003). Imperial China 900-1800. p. 798. ISBN9780674012127.
^Skaff, Jonathan (2012). Sui-Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power, and Connections, 580-800. p. 80. ISBN9780199734139.
^Stunkel, Kenneth (2012). Fifty Key Works of History and Historiography. p. 143. ISBN9781136723667.
^Horner, Charles (2010). Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context. p. 59. ISBN9780820335889.
^ a bMoody, Alys; Ross, Stephen (2020). Global Modernists on Modernism: An Anthology. p. 282. ISBN9781474242349.
^Grosse, Christine (2019). The Global Manager's Guide to Cultural Literacy. p. 71. ISBN9781527533875.
^Rošker, Jana; Suhadolnik, Nataša (2014). Modernisation of Chinese Culture: Continuity and Change. p. 74. ISBN9781443867726.
^Aldrich, M. A. (2008). The Search for a Vanishing Beijing: A Guide to China's Capital Through the Ages. p. 176. ISBN9789622097773.
^Schillinger, Nicholas (2016). The Body and Military Masculinity in Late Qing and Early Republican China: The Art of Governing Soldiers. p. 176. ISBN9781498531696.
^ a bHao, Shiyuan (2019). China's Solution to Its Ethno-national Issues. p. 51. ISBN9789813295193.
^Wells, Anne (2009). The A to Z of World War II: The War Against Japan. p. 167. ISBN9780810870260.
^Wu, Bin (2019). Government Performance Management in China: Theory and Practice. pp. 44–45. ISBN9789811382253.
^"历史上的国和代到底有什么区别?". Archived from the original on 15 January 2020. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^Besio, Kimberly (2012). Three Kingdoms and Chinese Culture. p. 64. ISBN9780791480496.
^Baaquie, Belal Ehsan; Wang, Qing-Hai (2018). "Chinese Dynasties and Modern China: Unification and Fragmentation". China and the World: Ancient and Modern Silk Road. 1 (1): 5. doi:10.1142/S2591729318500037.
^Nosco, Peter (1997). Confucianism and Tokugawa Culture. p. 68. ISBN9780824818654.
^Holcombe, Charles (2017). A History of East Asia. pp. 62–63. ISBN9781107118737.
^Yang, Shao-yun (2019). The Way of the Barbarians: Redrawing Ethnic Boundaries in Tang and Song China. p. 63. ISBN9780295746012.
^Chen, Huaiyu (2007). The Revival of Buddhist Monasticism in Medieval China. p. 24. ISBN9780820486246.
^Wakeman, Frederic (1985). The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-century China, Volume 1. p. 446. ISBN9780520048041.
^ a b c d e fLiu, Pujiang (2017). 正统与华夷:中国传统政治文化研究. ISBN9787101125795.
^ a b cLee, Thomas (2000). Education in Traditional China: A History. p. 238. ISBN9004103635.
^Ng, On Cho; Wang, Edward (2005). Mirroring the Past: The Writing And Use of History in Imperial China. p. 177. ISBN9780824829131.
^"宋和辽究竟哪个才是正统王朝?". Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^Brook, Walt van Praag & Boltjes (2018). p. 52.
^Biran, Michal (2005). The Empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian History: Between China and the Islamic World. p. 93. ISBN9780521842266.
^"试论清人的辽金"正统观"——以辽宋金"三史分修""各与正统"问题讨论为中心". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^Zhang, Feng (2015). Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East Asian History. p. 126. ISBN9780804795043.
^Okada, Hidehiro (2002). "Dayan Khan as a Yuan Emperor : The Political Legitimacy in 15th Century Mongolia" (PDF). Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient. 81: 53. Retrieved 7 March 2022.[permanent dead link]
^Brook, Walt van Praag & Boltjes (2018). p. 54.
^Chan, Wing-ming (2000). East Asian History, Issues 19-20. p. 30.
^Fang, Weigui (2019). Modern Notions of Civilization and Culture in China. p. 30. ISBN9789811335587.
^Baldanza, Kathlene (2016). Ming China and Vietnam. p. 206. ISBN9781107124240.
^Davis, Bret (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Philosophy. p. 294. ISBN9780199945726.
^Ng, Wai-ming (2019). Imagining China in Tokugawa Japan: Legends, Classics, and Historical Terms. p. xvii. ISBN9781438473086.
^Zhang, Xiaoling (2014). 從現代到後現代的自我追尋:夏目漱石與村上春樹的比較研究. p. 224. ISBN9789863263012.
^ a bWu, Huaiqi (2018). An Historical Sketch of Chinese Historiography. p. 322. ISBN9783662562536.
^Hudson, Christopher (2014). The China Handbook. p. 59. ISBN9781134269662.
^ a b"中国历史上十个大一统王朝,其中四个国祚不过百年". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^"我国历史上这两大王朝均是大一统王朝,却教科书上却极少被提及". Retrieved 24 January 2020.
^Graff, David; Higham, Robin (2012). A Military History of China. pp. 70–71. ISBN978-0813140674.
^ a b c d eZhang, Fan (2018). "Characteristics of the Yuan dynasty: Reflections on several issues from Mongol Yuan history". Chinese Studies in History. 51 (1): 52. doi:10.1080/00094633.2018.1466564. S2CID 165215790. Retrieved 2 January 2021.
^van de Ven, Hans (2000). Warfare in Chinese History. BRILL. p. 77. ISBN9004117741.
^Bulag, Uradyn (2010). Collaborative Nationalism: The Politics of Friendship on China's Mongolian Frontier. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 56–57. ISBN9781442204331.
^Wilkinson (2000). pp. 13–14.
^Zhu, Fayuan; Wu, Qixing (2000). 中国文化ABC. Beijing Book Co. ISBN9787210045892.
^ a b c d"历代王朝国号的分类". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^ a b c d e"名不正则言不顺:中国各朝代名称、国号的由来". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^"唐朝的皇帝姓李,为什么不叫李朝而叫唐朝?". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^ a b"先秦时期的诸侯国名,哪些最受后世的青睐?". Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^"后周皇帝列表及简介 后周太祖世宗恭帝简介 后周是怎么灭亡的". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^Hung, Hing Ming (2016). From the Mongols to the Ming Dynasty: How a Begging Monk Became Emperor of China, Zhu Yuan Zhang. Algora. p. 13. ISBN9781628941524.
^"南越国与南汉国". Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^Hu, Axiang; Song, Yanmei (2008). 中国国号的故事. 山东画报出版社. p. 171. ISBN9787807135999.
^ a b"明朝为何定国号为"大明",绝大部分人只知道五个原因中的一个". Retrieved 6 January 2020.
^"辽朝国号考释". Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
^Chan, Hok-lam (2003). 金宋史論叢. Chinese University Press. pp. 4–5. ISBN9789629960971.
^Fogel, Joshua (2015). The Cultural Dimensions of Sino-Japanese Relations: Essays on the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Routledge. p. 66. ISBN9781317457671.
^Xie, Xuanjun (2016). 士商工农──等级制度构建文明社会. Lulu.com. p. 379. ISBN9781329980136.
^Wang, Yuanchong (2018). Remaking the Chinese Empire: Manchu-Korean Relations, 1616–1911. Lexington Books. pp. 52–53. ISBN9781501730511.
^Wang, Fei-Ling (2017). The China Order: Centralia, World Empire, and the Nature of Chinese Power. State University of New York Press. p. 11. ISBN9781438467504.
^Kang, Jung In (2015). Western-Centrism and Contemporary Korean Political Thought. p. 71. ISBN9780739180990.
^"为何中国古代的一些朝代前要加上"东西南北",比如"西汉"呢?". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
^Christopher, James (1970). Conflict in the Far East. p. 5.
^Deghati, Reza; Giès, Jacques; Feugère, Laure; Coutin, André (2002). Painted Buddhas of Xinjiang: Hidden Treasures from the Silk Road. p. 43. ISBN9781588860279.
^Chang, Chun-shu (2007). The Rise of the Chinese Empire: Frontier, immigration, and empire in Han China, 130 B.C.–A.D. 157. pp. 179–180. ISBN9780472115341.
^Swope, Kenneth (2014). The Military Collapse of China's Ming Dynasty, 1618–44. p. 223. ISBN9781134462094.
^Dardess, John (2019). More Than the Great Wall: The Northern Frontier and Ming National Security, 1368–1644. p. 512. ISBN9781538135112.
^Wang, Guo'an (2007). A Handbook for 1,000 Basic Chinese Characters. p. 828. ISBN9789629962838.
^"汉分东西汉因为中间有新莽为什么唐朝中间有武周却不分东西唐". Retrieved 4 August 2020.
^Yuan, Haiwang (2010). This is China: The First 5,000 Years. p. 40. ISBN9781933782768.
^Hammond, Kenneth; Beezley, William; DeBlasi, Anthony; MacLachlan, Colin (2002). The Human Tradition in Premodern China. p. 77. ISBN9780842029599.
^ a bBrødsgaard, Kjeld (2008). Hainan – State, Society, and Business in a Chinese Province. p. 11. ISBN9781134045471.
^ a bWong, Koon-kwai (2009). Hong Kong, Macau and the Pearl River Delta: A Geographical Survey. pp. 241–242. ISBN9789882004757.
^ a bZhang, Wei Bin (2006). Hong Kong: The Pearl Made of British Mastery and Chinese Docile-diligence. p. 3. ISBN9781594546006.
^ a bHughes, Christopher (2013). Taiwan and Chinese Nationalism: National Identity and Status in International Society. p. 21. ISBN9781134727551.
^ a b cHsu, Cho-yun (2012). China: A New Cultural History. p. 421. ISBN9780231528184.
^ a b c d e fLockard, Craig (2020). Societies, Networks, and Transitions: A Global History. p. 260. ISBN9780357365472.
^ a b cGan, Chunsong (2019). A Concise Reader of Chinese Culture. p. 24. ISBN9789811388675.
^ a bWestad, Odd (2012). Restless Empire: China and the World Since 1750. p. 11. ISBN9780465029365.
^ a bSanders, Alan (2003). Historical Dictionary of Mongolia. p. v. ISBN9780810866010.
^ a bPaige, Jeffrey (1978). Agrarian Revolution. p. 278. ISBN9780029235508.
^ a bClarke, Michael (2011). Xinjiang and China's Rise in Central Asia - A History. p. 16. ISBN9781136827068.
^ a bKshetry, Gopal (2008). Foreigners in Japan: A Historical Perspective. p. 25. ISBN9781469102443.
^ a bTanner (2009). p. 167.
^Lockard (2020). p. 262.
^Hsu (2012). p. 268.
^D. K (2018). History of the World Map by Map. p. 133. ISBN9780241379189.
^Tan, Qixiang, ed. (1982). "元时期全图(一)". The Historical Atlas of China.
^Tan, Qixiang, ed. (1982). "元时期全图(二)". The Historical Atlas of China.
^Kavalski, Emilian (2014). Asian Thought on China's Changing International Relations. pp. 56–57. ISBN9781137299338.
^Rand, Christopher (2017). Military Thought in Early China. p. 142. ISBN9781438465180.
^Brown, Kerry (2018). China's 19th Party Congress: Start Of A New Era. p. 197. ISBN9781786345936.
^Tanner (2009). p. 419.
^Esherick, Joseph; Kayali, Hasan; Van Young, Eric (2006). Empire to Nation: Historical Perspectives on the Making of the Modern World. p. 245. ISBN9780742578159.
^Shaughnessy, Edward (2014). Unearthing the Changes: Recently Discovered Manuscripts of the Yi Jing (I Ching) and Related Texts. p. 19. ISBN9780231533300.
^Zhang, Qizhi (2015). An Introduction to Chinese History and Culture. p. 92. ISBN9783662464823.
^Earnshaw, Graham (2004). China Economic Review's China Business Guide 2005. p. 30. ISBN9781933782768.
^Adamek, Piotr (2017). Good Son is Sad If He Hears the Name of His Father: The Tabooing of Names in China as a Way of Implementing Social Values. Routledge. p. 344. ISBN9781351565219.
^Zhao, Yonghong (2010). 河西走廊藏文化史要. Beijing Book Co. ISBN9787542117083.
^Goodrich, Luther (2002). A Short History of the Chinese People. Courier Corporation. p. 85. ISBN9780486424880.
^Lü, Fu (2017). 历代兴衰演义. p. 154.
^Qin, Dashu; Yuan, Jian (2013). 2011:古丝绸之路. Global. p. 153. ISBN9789813206076.
^Hong, Yuan (2018). The Sinitic Civilization Book II: A Factual History Through the Lens of Archaeology, Bronzeware, Astronomy, Divination, Calendar and the Annals. ISBN9781532058318.
^Tian, Hengyu (2018). Infamous Chinese Emperors: Tales of Tyranny and Misrule. p. 180. ISBN9789812299314.
^Wang, Zhen'guo; Chen, Ping; Xie, Peiping (1999). History and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine. p. 94. ISBN9787030065674.
^ a b c d e fXiong, Victor (2017). Historical Dictionary of Medieval China. p. 613. ISBN9781442276161.
^Fairbank, John; Goldman, Merle (2006). China: A New History. p. 73. ISBN9780674018280.
^ a b c dSpring, Peter (2015). Great Walls and Linear Barriers. p. 211. ISBN9781473854048.
^Holcombe, Charles (2001). The Genesis of East Asia: 221 B.C.–A.D. 907. p. 140. ISBN9780824824655.
^Adamek, Piotr (2017). A Good Son is Sad if He Hears the Name of His Father: The Tabooing of Names in China as a Way of Implementing Social Values. p. 348. ISBN9781351565219.
^Su, Muzi (2006). 那些顛覆時代的女人.
^Standen, Naomi (2007). Unbounded Loyalty: Frontier Crossings in Liao China. p. 1. ISBN9780824829834.
^Schaeffer, Kurtis; Kapstein, Matthew; Tuttle, Gray (2013). Sources of Tibetan Tradition. p. 338. ISBN9780231509787.
^Wu, Jiang; Chia, Lucille (2015). Spreading Buddha's Word in East Asia: The Formation and Transformation of the Chinese Buddhist Canon. p. 175. ISBN9780231540193.
^Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy (2003). The Sino-Tibetan Languages. p. 7. ISBN9780700711291.
^Leidy, Denise (2008). The Art of Buddhism: An Introduction to Its History & Meaning. Shambhala Publications. p. 189. ISBN9781590306703.
^Hsu (2012). p. 272.
^Stone, Zofia (2017). Genghis Khan: A Biography. Vij Books India Private Limited. ISBN9789386367112.
^Szonyi, Michael (2017). A Companion to Chinese History. John Wiley & Sons. p. 130. ISBN9781118624609.
^Lee, Joo-Yup (2015). Qazaqlïq, or Ambitious Brigandage, and the Formation of the Qazaqs: State and Identity in Post-Mongol Central Eurasia. BRILL. p. 59. ISBN9789004306493.
^McMahon, Keith (2016). Celestial Women: Imperial Wives and Concubines in China from Song to Qing. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 24. ISBN9781442255029.
^Danver, Steven (2015). Native Peoples of the World: An Encyclopedia of Groups, Cultures and Contemporary Issues. Routledge. p. 244. ISBN9781317464006.
^Tuttle, Gray; Schaeffer, Kurtis (2013). The Tibetan History Reader. Columbia University Press. p. 562. ISBN9780231513548.
^Kessler, Adam (2012). Song Blue and White Porcelain on the Silk Road. BRILL. p. 77. ISBN978-9004218598.
^Simon, Karla (2013). Civil Society in China: The Legal Framework from Ancient Times to the "New Reform Era". Oxford University Press. p. 40. ISBN9780190297640.
^West, Stephen; Idema, Wilt (2014). The Orphan of Zhao and Other Yuan Plays: The Earliest Known Versions. p. ix. ISBN9780231538107.
^Wang, Zhenmin (2018). Relationship Between the Chinese Central Authorities and Regional Governments of Hong Kong and Macao: A Legal Perspective. p. 35. ISBN9789811323225.
^ a b c dChina: Five Thousand Years of History and Civilization. 2007. p. 107. ISBN9789629371401.
^ a b c d eZhang, Qizhi; Wang, Tianyou; Cheng, Chongde (2002). 元明清史. p. 381. ISBN9789571128696.
^ a b c dGan (2019). p. 26.
^Talmon, Stefan; Jia, Bing Bing (2014). The South China Sea Arbitration: A Chinese Perspective. p. 186. ISBN9781782253754.
^ a bRoy, Kaushik (2014). Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400–1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships. pp. 86–87. ISBN9781780938004.
^ a bWu, Chuanjun; Yang, Qinye; Lu, Qi (2002). 20世纪中国学术大典:地理学. p. 297. ISBN9787533430221.
^Ge, Jianxiong; Hua, Linfu (2002). "The Development of Chinese Historical Geography over the Last 50 Years (1950–2000)" (PDF). Newsletter for Research in Chinese Studies. 21 (4): 20. Retrieved 24 November 2019.
^Vu, Hong Lien; Sharrock, Peter (2014). Descending Dragon, Rising Tiger: A History of Vietnam. Reaktion Books. ISBN9781780233888.
^Walker, Hugh (2012). East Asia: A New History. AuthorHouse. p. 134. ISBN9781477265178.
^Chansiri, Disaphol (2008). The Chinese Émigrés of Thailand in the Twentieth Century. Cambria Press. pp. 46–47. ISBN9781934043745.
^Zheng, Yangwen (2011). China on the Sea: How the Maritime World Shaped Modern China. BRILL. p. 112. ISBN9789004194786.
^Rutherford, Scott (2002). Vietnam. Langenscheidt Publishing. p. 20. ISBN9789812349842.
^Minahan, James (2014). Ethnic Groups of North, East, and Central Asia: An Encyclopedia. Abc-Clio. p. 231. ISBN9781610690188.
^Elman, Benjamin; Liu, Jenny (2017). The 'Global' and the 'Local' in Early Modern and Modern East Asia. BRILL. p. 175. ISBN9789004338128.
^Chan, Robert (2017). Korea-China Relations in History and Contemporary Implications. Springer. p. 10. ISBN9783319622651.
^Wu, Weiming (2017). 東亞易學史論:《周易》在日韓越琉的傳播與影響. 國立臺灣大學出版中心. p. 161. ISBN9789863502500.
^Linduff, Katheryn; Rubinson, Karen (2008). Are All Warriors Male?: Gender Roles on the Ancient Eurasian Steppe. p. 126. ISBN9781461647508.
^Chan, Yuk Wah (2013). Vietnamese-Chinese Relationships at the Borderlands: Trade, Tourism and Cultural Politics. p. 28. ISBN9781134494576.
Sources
China Handbook Editorial Committee, China Handbook Series: History (trans., Dun J. Li), Beijing, 1982, pp. 188–189; and Shao Chang Lee, "China Cultural Development" (wall chart), East Lansing, 1984.
Wilkinson, Endymion Porter (2018). Chinese History: A New Manual (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center. ISBN9780998888309. Specifically Section A.2 "Dynasties", in this and earlier editions, which includes subsections on "Naming the Dynasties", "Sets of Dynasties", "The Dynastic Cycle", "Legitimate Succession", "Grade School History" (the effect on common understanding of China's history).
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Dynasties of China.