Enfield No. 2

Service revolver
Enfield No.2 Mk I* Revolver
An Enfield No.2 Mk I* manufactured in 1940
TypeService revolver
Place of originUnited Kingdom
Service history
In service1932–1963
Used byUnited Kingdom & Colonies
British Commonwealth
other countries
WarsWorld War II
Indonesian National Revolution
Malayan Emergency
Korean War
British colonial conflicts
Northern Campaign
Border Campaign
The Troubles
Production history
DesignerRoyal Small Arms Factory, Webley & Scott
Designed1928
ManufacturerRSAF Enfield
Produced1932–1957
No. builtapprox 55,000 Mk I & approx 270,000 Mk I* & Mk I**
VariantsEnfield No 2 Mk I, Enfield No 2 Mk I*, Enfield No 2 Mk I**
Specifications
Mass1.7 lb (765 g), unloaded
Length10.25 in (260 mm)
Barrel length5.03 in (127 mm)
Cartridge.380" Revolver Mk I or Mk IIz
Calibre0.38 inch (9.65 mm)
ActionDouble-action revolver (Mk I single/double action, Mk I* and Mk I** double action only)
Rate of fire20–30 rounds/minute
Muzzle velocity620 ft/s (189 m/s)
Effective firing range15 yards (13.7 m)
Maximum firing range200 yd (182.8 m)
Feed system6-round cylinder
Sightsfixed front post and rear notch

The Enfield No. 2 was a British top-break revolver using the .38 S&W round manufactured from 1930 to 1957. It was the standard British/Commonwealth sidearm in the Second World War, alongside the Webley Mk IV and Smith & Wesson Victory Model revolvers chambered in the same calibre. Note that in the context of British service revolvers, the .38 S&W cartridge has often been called ".380"[1] (no relation to the common modern .380 ACP pistol cartridge).

History

After the First World War, it was decided by the British Government that a smaller and lighter .38 calibre (9.2 mm) sidearm firing a long, heavy 200 grain (13 g) soft lead bullet would be preferable to the large Webley service revolvers using the .455 (11.6 mm) round.[2][3] While the .455 had proven to be an effective weapon for stopping enemy soldiers, the recoil of the .455 cartridge complicated marksmanship training.[4] The authorities began a search for a double-action revolver with less weight and recoil that could be quickly mastered by a minimally trained soldier,[5] with a good probability of hitting an enemy with the first shot at extremely close ranges.[6] By using a long, heavy, round-nosed lead bullet in a .38 calibre cartridge, it was found that the bullet, being minimally stabilised for its weight and calibre, tended to 'keyhole' or tumble longitudinally when striking an object, theoretically increasing wounding and stopping ability of human targets at short ranges.[7][8] At the time, the .38 calibre Smith & Wesson cartridge with 200-grain (13 g) lead bullet, known as the .38/200, was also a popular cartridge in civilian and police use (in the US, the .38/200 or 380/200 was known as the ".38 Super Police" load).[8]Consequently, the British firm of Webley & Scott tendered their Webley Mk IV revolver in .38/200 calibre.[9] Rather than adopting it, the British authorities took the design to the Government-run Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield, and the Enfield factory came up with a revolver that was very similar to the Webley Mk IV .38, but internally slightly different. The Enfield-designed pistol was quickly accepted under the designation "Revolver, No 2 Mk I" (single/double action, with a hammer spur), and was adopted in 1931,[10] followed in 1938 by the Mk I* (lightened trigger pull, spurless hammer, double-action only),[11] and finally the Mk I** (simplified for wartime production) in 1942.[12]

Webley sued the British Government for £2,250, being "costs involved in the research and design" of the revolver. Their action was contested by Enfield, who stated that the Enfield No 2 Mk I was actually designed by Captain Boys (the Assistant Superintendent of Design, after whom the Boys Rifle was named) with assistance from Webley & Scott, and not the other way around—accordingly, their claim was denied. By way of compensation, however, the Royal Commission on Awards to Inventors awarded Webley & Scott £1,250.[13]

RSAF Enfield was unable to manufacture enough No. 2 revolvers to meet the military's wartime demands, and as a result Webley's Mk IV was issued as a substitute standard for the British Army.

Variants

Enfield No. 2 Mk 1 mfg 1938 in original condition, with hammer spur and original wood grips. Operates both single and double action.
An Enfield No. 2 Mk1* in fine condition. From bench rest at 25 yards.
One hand rapid fire group with Enfield .38/200

There were three main variants of the Enfield No 2 Mk I revolver. The first was the Mk I which had a full-spur hammer and was double-action/single-action, meaning the shooter could either thumb-cock the hammer before pulling the trigger or could pull the trigger with the hammer uncocked; some shooters preferred the latter option as the trigger pull is much lighter with the hammer cocked. The handgrips were made of wood. This version was made until 1939, when a change order introduced the Mk I*. About 55,000 Mk Is were made, and an unknown number were converted to Mk I* during factory repair, as required by the change order that created the Mk I*. See: Stamps, Mark, and Ian Skennerton, .380 Enfield Revolver No. 2 for further information.

The second variant was the Mk I*, which had a spurless hammer and was double-action only, meaning that the hammer could not be thumb-cocked by the shooter for each shot. Additionally, in keeping with the revolver's purpose as a close-range weapon, the handgrips, now made of plastic, were redesigned to improve grip when used in rapid double-action fire; the new handgrip design was given the designation Mk II.[14] The majority of Enfields produced were either Mk I* or modified to that standard.[15]

The third variant was the Mk I**, which was a 1942 variant of the Mk I* simplified in order to increase production, but was discontinued shortly thereafter as a result of safety concerns over some of the introduced modifications.

The vast majority of Enfield No 2 Mk I revolvers were modified to Mk I* during World War II, generally as they came in for repair or general maintenance;[11] It is believed that the reason was that the Mk I* version was cheaper and faster to manufacture and allowed for far quicker training.[16] When used in the manner in which British forces trained (rapid double-action fire at very close ranges), the No 2 Mk I* is at least as accurate as any other service pistol of its time, because of the relatively light double-action trigger pull. It is not, however, the best choice for deliberately aimed, long-distance shooting — the double-action pull will throw the most competent shooter's aim off enough to noticeably affect accuracy at ranges of more than 15 yards (14 m) or so.[3]Despite officially being declared obsolete at the end of World War II, the Enfield (and Webley revolvers) were not completely phased out in favour of the Browning Hi-Power until April 1969.[17]

The Enfield No 2 is very fast to reload—as are all British top-break revolvers—because of its automatic ejector, which simultaneously removes all six cases from the cylinder. British combat experience with the .38/200 Enfield revolvers during World War II seemed to confirm that, "for the average soldier", the Enfield No. 2 Mk I could be used far more effectively than the bulkier and heavier .455 calibre Webley revolvers that had been issued during World War I.[3] Perhaps because of the relatively long double-action trigger pull compared to other pistols capable of single-action fire,[15] the double-action-only Mk I* revolvers were not popular with troops,[15] many of whom took the first available opportunity to exchange them in favour of Smith & Wesson, Colt, or Webley revolvers.[18]

Ammunition

The Enfield No.2 Mk I was designed for use with the Cartridge S.A. Ball Revolver .380 inch Mk. I and Mk. Iz, a deviation of the .38 Smith & Wesson cartridge, also known as the .38/200. It had a 200 gr (13 g). unjacketed round-nose, lead bullet of .359 inch diameter that developed a muzzle velocity of 620–650 ft/s (190–200 m/s).

Just prior to the outbreak of the Second World War, British authorities became concerned that the soft unjacketed lead bullet used in the 380/200 might be considered as violating the Hague Convention of 1899 governing deforming or 'explosive bullets'. A new .38 loading was introduced for use in combat utilizing a 178-grain (11.5 g), gilding-metal-jacketed lead bullet; new foresights were issued to compensate for the new cartridge's ballistics and change to the point of aim.[14] The new cartridge was accepted into Commonwealth Service as "Cartridge, Pistol, .380 Mk IIz", firing a 178 - 180 grain (11.7 g) full metal jacket round-nose bullet. The 380/200 Mk I lead bullet cartridge was continued in service, originally restricted to training and marksmanship practice.[14] However, after the outbreak of war, supply exigencies forced British authorities to use both the 380/200 Mk I and the .380 Mk IIz loadings interchangeably in combat. U.S. ammunition manufacturers such as Winchester-Western supplied 380/200 Mk I cartridges to British forces throughout the war.[19]

Other manufacturers

The vast majority of Enfield No 2 revolvers were made by RSAF (Royal Small Arms Factory) Enfield, but wartime necessities meant that numbers were produced elsewhere. Albion Motors in Scotland made the Enfield No 2 Mk I* from 1941 to 1943, whereupon the contract for production was passed onto Coventry Gauge & Tool Co. By 1945, 24,000[20] Enfield No 2 Mk I* and Mk I** revolvers had been produced by Albion/CG&T. The Singer Sewing Machine Company of Clydebank made components but they were assembled at Enfield under their proofmarks; Singer-made parts are marked "SSM".

The Howard Auto Cultivator Company (HAC) in New South Wales, Australia tooled up and began manufacturing the Enfield No 2 Mk I* and I** revolvers in 1941, but the production run was very limited (estimated at around 350 or so revolvers in total), and the revolvers produced were criticised for being non-interchangeable, even with other HAC-produced revolvers. Very few HAC revolvers are known to exist, and it is thought by many collectors that most of the HAC revolvers may have been destroyed in the various Australian Gun Amnesties and "Buy-Backs".

Users

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Stamps, Mark, and Ian Skennerton, .380 Enfield Revolver No. 2, page 11.
  2. ^ Stamps, Mark, and Ian Skennerton, .380 Enfield Revolver No. 2, page 9.
  3. ^ a b c Smith, W.H.B, 1943 Basic Manual of Military Small Arms (facsimile), page 11.
  4. ^ Shore, C. (Capt), With British Snipers to the Reich, Paladin Press (1988), pp. 200-201
  5. ^ Weeks, John, World War II Small Arms, London: Orbis Publishing Ltd. (1979), p. 76: "the standard pistol training ammunition allocation per soldier was only 12 rounds per year"
  6. ^ Shore, C. (Capt), With British Snipers to the Reich, Paladin Press (1988), p. 201
  7. ^ Shore, (1988) p. 202
  8. ^ a b Barnes, Frank C., Cartridges of the World, 6th ed. DBI Books (1989), p. 239
  9. ^ Maze, Robert J., Howdah to High Power, page 103.
  10. ^ § A6862, LoC
  11. ^ a b § B2289, LoC
  12. ^ § B6712, LoC
  13. ^ Stamps, Mark, and Ian Skennerton, .380 Enfield Revolver No. 2, page 12.
  14. ^ a b c Dunlap, Roy, Ordnance Went Up Front, Samworth Press (1948), p. 141
  15. ^ a b c Weeks, John, World War II Small Arms, London: Orbis Publishing Ltd. (1979), p. 76
  16. ^ Wilson, Royce, "A Tale of Two Collectables", Australian Shooter magazine, March 2006.
  17. ^ Stamps, Mark, and Ian Skennerton, .380 Enfield Revolver No. 2, page 118
  18. ^ Stamps, Mark, and Ian Skennerton, .380 Enfield Revolver No. 2, page 79
  19. ^ Shore, C. (Capt.), With British Snipers to the Reich, Paladin Press (1989), p. 201
  20. ^ Hogg, Ian V., and John Walter.Pistols of the World, 4th Ed.
  21. ^ Jane's Infantry Weapons 1987. Janes Information Group. 1987. p. 976.
  22. ^ a b Hogg, Ian (1989). Jane's Infantry Weapons 1989-90, 15th Edition. Jane's Information Group. p. 831. ISBN 978-0-7106-0889-5.
  23. ^ "World Infantry Weapons: Libya". Archived from the original on 5 October 2016.
  24. ^ "Weapons of the Police and Auxiliary Forces in Malaya".
  25. ^ Maung, Aung Myoe (2009). Building the Tatmadaw: Myanmar Armed Forces Since 1948. ISBN 978-981-230-848-1.
  26. ^ Bloomfield, Lincoln P.; Leiss, Amelia Catherine (30 June 1967). The Control of local conflict : a design study on arms control and limited war in the developing areas (PDF). Vol. 3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for International Studies. pp. 78, 89. hdl:2027/uiug.30112064404368. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 August 2020.
  27. ^ Stack, Wayne; O’Sullivan, Barry (20 March 2013). The New Zealand Expeditionary Force in World War II. Men-at-Arms 486. Osprey Publishing. p. 44. ISBN 9781780961118.

References

  • Smith, W.H.B. 1943 Basic Manual of Military Small Arms (facsimile). Harrisburg, Penn.: Stackpole Books, 1979. ISBN 0-8117-1699-6.
  • Stamps, Mark, and Ian Skennerton. .380 Enfield Revolver No 2. London: Greenhill Books, 1993. ISBN 1-85367-139-8.
  • Gerard, Henrotin. "Enfield no 2 revolver explained". HLebooks.com, November 2018.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Enfield No.2.
  • The Corps of the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers Museum of Technology: Pistol Revolver .38 inch No 2 Mk I and again
  • world.guns.ru
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Enfield_No._2&oldid=1245284275"