Talk:Identity politics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Identity politics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Feminism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBT articles Human rights High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2023 and 26 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angel.e.sosa (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jeffers.s9, Isad15.

— Assignment last updated by A.lejla (talk) 19:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't Black Lives Matter mentioned? 192.118.27.253 (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is arguably the most important Identity Politics movement 192.118.27.253 (talk) 11:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's important to add information about some of the most famous contemporary groups/identities as it relates to identity politics. This will include information about #BlackLivesMatter, the counter movement, #AllLivesMatter, Proud Boys, and Antifa. Wrig36 (talk) 01:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a comment on the "undue weight" reference to this quote.

It is useful to look at the psychology of identitiation ie is it a self centred thought process? This is what the last sentence of the Wikipedia quote asserts. The quote suggests consequences of identification - "surround themselves with a moral force field". The process of identification inevitably changes the way people interact with the identifier. It can also lead to the checking of thoughts and speech. In contrast not identifying "as anything" maximises the opportunities for interaction.

I feel the intent of the quote does not provide "undue weight" but there may be better words to comment on the sociology/psychology of the internal process in the individual asserting identity. A more community valuable approach is to identify the issue as this is much more objective in its thought process. Sigma1950 (talk) 01:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the quote. There are countless opinion columnists, and this topic doesn't need more hot air. A reliable, independent source would need to indicate to us why Brendan O'Neill (columnist)'s hot take from one 2015 column is important enough to include, and from that, we could decide if this particular quote is the best way to summarize that column. Lacking such an indication, this doesn't belong. Grayfell (talk) 01:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]